🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.